Log in
     
3rd Amended Complaint
Details for 3rd Amended Complaint
PropertyValue
Name3rd Amended Complaint
Description

As repeated by His Honor Circuit Judge Michael Daly Hawkins;

“Truth needs no disguise”
Docketed confessions of fraud on the court are core to plaintiff’s case; but
no proper adjudication upon the merits of the condemnatory has transpired.
”In this Circuit’s case of Dixon v Commissioner of Internal Revenue, No. 00-70858, His Honor Michael Daly Hawkins discussed governing issues of fraud on the court, by officers of the court citing the U.S. Supreme Court case of In re Hazel-Atlas Glass v Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 247 (1944).

 

Docketed confessions of fraud on the court are core to plaintiff’s case; but
no proper adjudication upon the merits of the condemnatory has transpired.

It should be axiomatic that integrity of the judicial process and a counsel’s
loyalty to a client are sacrosanct. Yet, the gravity of artful premeditated collusion to
gain unjust enrichment via frauds on the court and betrayal of a client’s trust/
breach of court ordered fiduciary duty; has been inexplicably/intolerably ignored.

Emboldened by federal agents/agencies willful blindness and/or staunch
refusals to prosecute wealthy parties; Defendants now seek to utilize visible frauds
on court to stymie justice here. Culprits brought to (some) justice by whistleblower
are being permitted to cry vexatious. Surely a victim of organized crimes unseemly
benefiting from venal feds permitting attorneys to betray their court approved
clients; most certainly grants any quarry the right to vex the malfeasants!
FilenameRICO_eToys_Clockd_Apr14_DI_69_Motion_for_and_3rd_Amended_Complaint.pdf
Filesize2.18 MB
Filetypepdf (Mime Type: application/pdf)
Creatoradmin
Created On: 09/14/2014 21:32
ViewersEverybody
Maintained byEditor
Hits4643 Hits
Last updated on 09/14/2014 21:40
Homepage
CRC Checksum
MD5 Checksum

Latest Documents